The Department of Justice Antitrust Division has recently been investigating public companies for possible violations of Section 8 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 19, based on information listed in the Risk Factors section of their annual and quarterly SEC filings. Section 8 prohibits “interlocking directorates,” situations in which an individual or entity serves as a director or officer of two corporations that are “competitors.” So far, the Departments efforts have appeared to focus on interlocks in which one company named the other as a competitor in a public filing. In this article, we explain that the “competitors” listed in a public company’s SEC filings are not necessarily competitors within the meaning of Section 8.

By Michelle Yost Hale & Jake Philipoom[1]

 

The Department of Justice Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) has recently been investigating public companies for possible violations of Section 8 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 19, based on information listed in the Risk Factors section of their annual and quarterly SEC filings. Section 8 prohibits “interlocking directorates,” situations in which an individual or entity serves as a director or officer of two corporations that are “competitors.” As Deputy Assistant Attorney General Andrew Forman recently stated, “the Division is committed to taking aggressive action” against board interlocks.[2]

So far, DOJ’s efforts appear to focus on interlocks in which one company named

...
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 18.97.9.175

Please verify email or join us
to access premium content!