A case before the US Supreme Court on how antitrust laws are enforced has the potential to affect health care in a way that would harm patient care and interfere with a physician’s duty to a patient to provide the best medical care, reported the American Medical Association (AMA).
The case before the nation’s highest court, State of Ohio et al. v. American Express Company et al., involves how a credit card company operates, although this may seem far removed from the practice of medicine, the underlying issue the justices are considering is how federal antitrust laws are applied. Their ruling could upend how the courts determine whether anti-steering provisions are violated under the Sherman Act.
If the nation’s highest court upholds a ruling by the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, it would mean dominant health insurers or dominant hospital systems could create contracts that include anti-referral rules that prohibit physicians from referring patients to out-of-network specialists for innovative or medically-necessary tests that would provide the patient with the best care. So argues an amicus brief the Litigation Center for the AMA and State Medical Societies and the Ohio State Medical Association filed with the US Supreme Court.
“Material interference with physicians’ medical judgments threatens physician autonomy, damages the doctor-patient relationship, decreases medical innovation and lowers the overall quality of patient care,” the Litigation Center brief states. “The antitrust laws have historically played an instrumental role in preventing such outcomes. This court should ensure that antitrust law’s vital role in health care continues.”
Full Content: AMA Wire
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
