Berkshire Hathaway’s Charlie Munger wants America to take a page from China and ban cryptocurrencies.
In a Wall Street Journal opinion piece Wednesday (Feb. 1), the billionaire vice chairman of the conglomerate decried the “wretched excess” of the crypto market.
“A cryptocurrency is not a currency, not a commodity, and not a security,” he wrote. “Instead, it’s a gambling contract with a nearly 100% edge for the house, entered into in a country where gambling contracts are traditionally regulated only by states that compete in laxity.”
Munger argued China offers the U.S. a way forward, saying that the country banned cryptocurrencies after determining “they would provide more harm than benefit.”
China instituted that ban in 2021, saying that it wanted to protect national security and social stability. The government cited the use of cryptocurrencies in illegal activities like gambling, money laundering and pyramid schemes.
Related: US Congressman Blames ‘Billionaire Crypto Bros’ For Delayed Regulations
It’s not the first time Munger, who will turn 100 next year, has voiced his contempt for crypto. (His business partner Warren Buffet is of the same mindset, once referring to bitcoin as “rat poison squared.”)
In November, Munger gave an interview with CNBC in which he called cryptocurrencies a mix of fraud and delusion.
“That’s a bad combination,” he said. “I don’t like either fraud or delusion. And the delusion may be more extreme than the fraud.”
Those comments came in the wake of the collapse and bankruptcy of the FTX exchange, which has since led to calls for the government to take action on the crypto sector.
Much of that conversation has centered around regulating, and not banning, cryptocurrencies. Earlier this week, the Biden administration called on Congress to speed up its crypto enforcement efforts as the White House unveiled a “roadmap” for dealing with the sector.
In that document, the White House warns against “deepening ties between cryptocurrencies and the broader financial system,” even going so far as to call the prospect a “grave mistake.”
