Tag: Section 5
A Comparative and Economic Analysis of the US FTC’s Complaint and...
Posted by Social Science Research Network
A Comparative and Economic Analysis of the US FTC's Complaint and the Korea FTC's Decision Against Qualcomm
By Koren W....
SEP-09(2)
In this issue:
Of Current Interest
Michael Baumann, Paul Godek, Sep 24, 2009
Reconciling the Opposing Views of Critical Elasticity
We present a revised and more...
SEP-13(1)
One of the consistently thorny issues in U.S. antitrust law is the rather vague boundary of Section 5 of the FTC Act, which concerns...
FEB-10(2)
In this issue:
Welcome to the home page of The CPI Antitrust Chronicle (formerly GCP Magazine). In this issue, we're taking the first of what...
Nov-08(1)
The EC Pharmaceutical Report
Kent Bernard, Nov 12, 2008
The 2008 EC Sector Inquiry Regarding Pharmaceuticals: What Does It Mean from a Research-Based Company Perspective?
A sector...
A Response To Commissioner Wright’s Proposed Policy Statement Regarding Unfair Methods...
Maurice Stucke, Sep 16, 2013
Federal Trade Commissioner Joshua Wright recently proposed a new legal standard to evaluate "unfair methods of competition" under Section 5...
Section 5 Enforcement: Common Law Guidance
This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Pete Levitas, Farrell Malone, Jul 24, 2015
The proper scope of the U.S Federal...
Standard-Essential Patents and Antitrust: Of Fighting Ships and Frankenstein Monsters
Sean P. Gates, Oct 15, 2013
Standard-essential patents (“SEPs”) have been at the heart of a debate about the reach of U.S. antitrust ...
A Solution in Search of a Problem
A. Douglas Melamed, Sep 16, 2013
The fundamental problem with the "unfair methods of competition" prong of Section 5 is that it is hopelessly vague....
Patent Assertion Entities: Six Actions the Antitrust Agencies Can Take
Jan 29, 2013
One of the most pressing issues confronting antitrust in 2013 (and beyond) involves patent assertion entities ("PAEs"), previously known as patent trolls....
