Tag: Reverse Payment Settlements
SEP-13(2)
Last June, the U.S. Supreme Court finally tackled Reverse Payments. In Actavis, they leaned away from many lower court decisions and acknowledged that reverse...
Supreme Court Rules in Reverse Payment Case
Kevin Noonan, Sep 30, 2013
In June, the Supreme Court ruled 5-3 in favor of the Federal Trade Commission in FTC v. Actavis, Inc. Writing...
Reverse Payments After Actavis
John Bigelow, Sep 30, 2013
Thirteen years ago-in 2000-the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") and private plaintiffs began fighting certain kinds of settlements that sometimes arise...
Reverse Payments Post Actavis: A Litigation Quagmire?
This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Keith Hylton, Jul 15, 2015
For the last decade or so, the FTC has...
What’s Nexium After Actavis?
This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Ankur Kapoor, Rosa Morales, Oct 29, 2014
As the first reverse-payment antitrust case to...
Defining “Payments”: The First Post-Actavis Battleground in Pharmaceutical Reverse Payments
This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Lauren Battaglia, Apr 29, 2014
In June 2013, the Supreme Court ruled in FTC...
Courts’ Prescription for Reverse-Payment Settlements Still Unknown Almost a Year After...
This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Ankur Kapoor, Rosa Morales, Apr 29, 2014
Nearly a year after the Supreme Court...
New Jersey District Court Limits Actavis To Cash Payments
This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Donald Falk, Christopher Kelly, Apr 29, 2014
As with patent infringement litigation in many...
Pay-for-Delay
Fiona Scott Morton, Dec 20, 2013
This article lays out the economics of competition between branded and generic pharmaceuticals and its welfare consequences. I explain...
“Pay-for-Delay”: What Do We Disagree On?
Pierre Regibeau, Dec 20, 2013
Antitrust concerns about “pay-for-delay” patent settlements are based on two theories of harms, one that stresses the need for courts...