Judges’ Presence on Social Media: Dangers of Posting, Liking, and Sharing

By: Molly Codeanne (Journal of High Technology Law)

Parents always tell their children that what they say, post, like, and share on social media sticks around forever and can have unintended consequences down the line if you are not careful.  Judges must heed this advice and exercise heightened caution when engaging in social media as the courts have disqualified more than one judge from presiding over a case since April of 2022.  There is a fine line between posting in support of a popular and respected view and posting in a way that could lead to a finding of partiality or prejudice, especially in today’s heated political climate.  Most recently, Judge Josephine Buckner was disqualified from presiding over a series of cases against several protestors, in connection with the Breonna Taylor case.  Judges, who hold positions of power and privilege, must look forward to the future before posting and consider the consequences of how his or her actions on social media may be construed.

Josephine Buckner was scheduled to preside over cases against 26 protestors who had blocked an overpass during the Breonna Taylor protests.  Among other reasons, her removal stemmed from posts on Facebook that she had shared, or reposted, prior to becoming a judge on the Jefferson District Court of Kentucky.  An August 2020 post stated that, “today is a great day to arrest the cops who lied in

...
THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 18.97.9.168

Please verify email or join us
to access premium content!