Some Japanese eateries using services of restaurant review websites have had the terms of their contracts unilaterally changed by the site operators, a survey report from the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) showed on Wednesday, March 18.
Such acts by the website operators could amount to abuse of a dominant bargaining position in violation of the antimonopoly law. The antitrust watchdog plans to call on the operators to voluntarily put improvement steps into place, while taking strict action against clear cases of law violations.
The JFTC launched the survey on the matter last April, covering 17 review sites and some 500 eateries using their services.
Noting that such site operators are likely to be in advantageous positions as eateries often depend on the review websites to attract customers, the report listed potential antimonopoly law violation cases collected from eateries and presented steps for improvements.
According to the report, eateries also complained of such dubious practices as operators demanding higher discount rates than for other review websites and more seats set aside for reservations.
Full Content: Nippon
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
