In June 2020, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) fined the musical instrument firm Roland just over £4 million (US$5.6 million) for restricting online discounting of its electronic drum kits between 2011 and 2018. This was one of several fines imposed by the CMA on leading musical instrument suppliers for requiring retailers to sell their products online at or above a minimum price, a practice known as “resale price maintenance” (RPM).
The fine imposed by the CMA had been reduced under its leniency and settlement programs to take account of the fact that Roland had admitted acting illegally and cooperated with the CMA’s investigation. In a highly unusual move, Roland appealed to the Competition Appeal Tribunal against the level of the fine which it had itself agreed to pay as part of its settlement with the CMA.
In this judgment, the Tribunal unanimously upheld the CMA’s decision in its entirety, dismissing Roland’s arguments that its conduct was not sufficiently serious to justify such a high fine and that the CMA should have awarded it a higher leniency discount.
The Tribunal also agreed with the CMA that, by appealing against the CMA’s decision, Roland had breached its bargain with the CMA to accept a lower fine in return for agreeing not to appeal. It decided that Roland should therefore lose the benefit of its 20% settlement discount. As a result, Roland’s fine was increased to just over £5 million (US$7 million), an increase of more than £1 million.
Michael Grenfell, the CMA’s Executive Director of Enforcement, said, “This is an important judgment from the Tribunal and sends a strong message that when a company agrees to end an investigation through a settlement, it cannot reopen the question by appealing without losing its discount. This reinforces the CMA’s view that settlements should be final.”
