Jackson Hewitt has asked a federal judge in New Jersey to dismiss claims that agreements between the company and its franchisees not to poach each other’s workers violated federal antitrust law, saying brand parents and franchisees are “legally incapable” of an anticompetitive conspiracy.
The tax preparation company claimed that unlike competing businesses, franchisors and franchisees share economic interests and agreements between them do not have the anticompetitive effects prohibited by the Sherman Antitrust Act, in a motion filed on Tuesday, May 28.
Full Content: Reuters
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
