NOV-12(2)

We’re looking at one of the most topical and controversial topics of 2012 – LIBOR. There’s a surprisingly strong antitrust connection. Restructuring proposals, as well as calculating potential criminal liabilities, will demand competition experience – requiring antitrust counsel and regulator expertise well into 2013 and more. In this issue, managed by Editorial Board Member Rosa Abrantes-Metz, we look at four different sides of the question: how LIBOR should be reformed, the reasons why antitrust is so applicable and the lessons from LIBOR, the implications for antitrust compliance, and, even more specifically, the eerie similarity to cartels. In short, these articles provide all the necessary background and set the stage for future LIBOR decisions.

 

The Surprising Correlation Between LIBOR and Antitrust

Rosa Abrantes-Metz, David Evans, Nov 28, 2012

Will The Wheatley Recommendations Fix LIBOR?

Our proposal relies on setting up incentives for the banks to freely submit quotes which are representative of their actual borrowing costs. Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz (NYU Stern School of Business & Global Economics Group) & David S. Evans (Global Economics Group & University of Chicago Law School)

Michael Barr, Nov 28, 2012

Too LIBOR, Too Late: Time to Move to a Market Rate

The proposed reforms are too reliant on the existing structure of LIBOR, and come too late to save it. Michael S. Barr (Univ. of Michigan)

David Flower, Nov 28, 2012

The LIBOR Scandal and Lessons for Antitrust Compliance Programs

As eye-opening as the LIBOR scandal was for the general public, it was old news for the banking industry, which had been expecting the hammer to eventually drop. David Flower (Grant Thornton)

Michael Eisenkraft, J. Douglas Richards, Nov 28, 2012

Restraint of Trade: Does Manipulation of LIBOR Fall Within the Sherman Act’s Definition of Trade A Question of First Principles

If this reasoning is adopted, which this article contends it should be, LIBOR should fall within the purview of the Sherman Act, as it is a commodity and therefore part of trade. J. Douglas Richards & Michael B. Eisenkraft (Cohen Milstein)

Grant Murray, Douglas Tween, Nov 28, 2012

Lessons for Multinational Companies from the LIBOR Investigations: Observations from an Antitrust Perspective

The proliferation of investigations is an example of a modern antitrust phenomenon cascading cartels where an investigation into one product market in a particular region promptly leads to investigations of the same product in different regions…Douglas M. Tween & Grant Murray (Baker & McKenzie)

Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Daniel Sokol, Nov 28, 2012

Lessons from LIBOR for Detection and Deterrence of Cartel Wrongdoing

Yet, the very nature of the manipulation, in hindsight, seems rather obvious. Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz (NYU Stern School of Business & Global Economics Group) & D. Daniel Sokol (Univ. of Minnesota Law School and Univ. of Florida Levin School of Law)

Rodger Burnett, Lianne Craig, Gurpreet Gchhokar, Nov 28, 2012

The Lie in LIBOR: Seeds of a Cartel?

There is an abundance of circumstantial evidence to suggest that a cartel existed among LIBOR panel banks. Lianne Craig, Rodger Burnett, & Gurpreet Chhokar (Hausfeld & Co LLP)

Nov 28, 2012

What to Do About LIBOR: A Special CPI Webinar

An all-star cast in a webinar asking: Should LIBOR should be tweaked, overhauled, or blown up? And what happens to all those contracts that are pegged to LIBOR now?