Jimmy John’s dodged a bid for class action status in a federal court in Illinois by the employees leading an antitrust challenge to a “no poach” agreement that previously prohibited the sandwich chain’s franchise locations from recruiting one another’s workers.
Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel declined to certify the case as a class action July 30, citing reasons similar to those offered by the federal judge in Chicago who ruled against McDonald’s workers in a similar case two days earlier.
Plaintiff Donald Conrad claims that the franchises of the restaurant orchestrated a conspiracy among its owners to suppress the wages of more than 550,000 employees by agreeing not to hire each other’s workers. Conrad is seeking to represent a nationwide Class of every employee who worked at a Jimmy John’s restaurant for a period of four years.
Read More: Jimmy John’s to appeal no-poach ruling
The defendant argues in its motion that there are “intractable intra-class conflicts” between Conrad the Class Members that he would like to represent as well as between the employees within the Class.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
